Comments for Protofy - The art of Prototyping http://proto5.net What we prototype is something under discussion, what we dont is reality Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:37:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on Jquery is faster in the Mootools SlickSpeed Test. by Juan Toro http://proto5.net/2007/10/jquery-is-faster-in-the-mootools-slickspeed-test/comment-page-1/#comment-112 Juan Toro Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:37:33 +0000 http://proto5.com/?p=26#comment-112 I guess this is a matter of browsers too... in chrome I found mootools being the fastest, and in FF3 the fastest is for long Dojo 1.1.1 I guess this is a matter of browsers too… in chrome I found mootools being the fastest, and in FF3 the fastest is for long Dojo 1.1.1

]]> Comment on When custom attributes conflict with validation by R http://proto5.net/2008/08/when-custom-attributes-conflict-with-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-106 R Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:47:19 +0000 http://proto5.net/?p=43#comment-106 test test

]]> Comment on Jquery is faster in the Mootools SlickSpeed Test. by Andrew http://proto5.net/2007/10/jquery-is-faster-in-the-mootools-slickspeed-test/comment-page-1/#comment-103 Andrew Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:32:40 +0000 http://proto5.com/?p=26#comment-103 I suppose you've only passed this test on IE. In Firefox, Safari & Opera I have the mootools and prototype frameworks faster than jquery up to 100%. I suppose you’ve only passed this test on IE. In Firefox, Safari & Opera I have the mootools and prototype frameworks faster than jquery up to 100%.

]]> Comment on More Jquery : Reflections by rama http://proto5.net/2007/05/more-jquery-reflections/comment-page-1/#comment-94 rama Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:13:55 +0000 http://proto5.com/?p=17#comment-94 Its a great attempt, however the script generates a ton of divs to achieve the effect. I dont know what you mean by a purely client side implementation as Jquery is also "purely clientside" The Jquery implementation takes the picture, flips it and adds a opacity filter to it, In IE your script has a unwanted side effect of "32 images downloading etc." , In firefox the results are surprisingly smooth. Its a great attempt, however the script generates a ton of divs to achieve the effect. I dont know what you mean by a purely client side implementation as Jquery is also “purely clientside”

The Jquery implementation takes the picture, flips it and adds a opacity filter to it,

In IE your script has a unwanted side effect of “32 images downloading etc.” , In firefox the results are surprisingly smooth.

]]> Comment on More Jquery : Reflections by Another Reflection script http://proto5.net/2007/05/more-jquery-reflections/comment-page-1/#comment-93 Another Reflection script Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:06:59 +0000 http://proto5.com/?p=17#comment-93 http://n.vain.in/reflect.html has a purely client side javascript implementation of reflection http://n.vain.in/reflect.html has a purely client side javascript implementation of reflection

]]> Comment on Can you guess what the code below is doing? by niharika http://proto5.net/2006/10/can-you-guess-what-the-code-below-is-doing/comment-page-1/#comment-84 niharika Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:01:24 +0000 http://proto5.com/?p=14#comment-84 this code is working properly in IE but not in Firefox.Some javascript error like event not declared in line $ul=Event.element(event).parentElement.getElementsByTagName(“UL”)[0]; Please help its urgent this code is working properly in IE but not in Firefox.Some javascript error like event not declared
in line $ul=Event.element(event).parentElement.getElementsByTagName(“UL”)[0];
Please help its urgent

]]>